Skip to content

Compared on fifteen questions · checked 10 Oct 2026

Mentionova vs Bluefish AI

An enterprise engine sold by demo, or a platform you can price, trial and run yourself?

Choose Bluefish AI if you're a Fortune 500 brand that wants services bundled with software.

Choose Mentionova if you want to see prices and run a trial before talking to anyone.

14 days · no card · first growth signal in ~2 minutes

Case file · bluefishChecked 10 Oct 2026
MentionovaBluefish AI

Engines

6

3 on Starter

5

named on its site

Runs

Weekly to monthly

opportunities nightly

Daily

From

$99/mo

billed annually

Not published

Trial

14 days

no card

Not published

Bluefish AI's numbers come from its own pricing page, docs and changelog

02 · The short answer

Who each one is for.

Bluefish AI positions itself as the agentic marketing engine for the Fortune 500, with $68 million raised, daily tracking across ten-plus models including Alexa for Shopping, tactic-level attribution and native MCP. There is no published pricing, engine list, trial, API documentation or security page; the way in is a sales conversation.

Bluefish AI describes itself as “Agentic Marketing Platform” and leads with “The Agentic Marketing Engine for the Fortune 500.”.

Founded
Launched 2024
Based in
New York
Funding
$68M (NEA, Threshold Ventures)
Sells to
Fortune 500 marketing teams

Choose Bluefish AI if

  1. 01

    You're a Fortune 500 brand that wants services bundled with software.

  2. 02

    Tactic-level attribution to a date and a metric is your main ask.

  3. 03

    Alexa for Shopping is a surface you sell on.

Choose Mentionova if

  1. 01

    You want to see prices and run a trial before talking to anyone.

  2. 02

    You need published facts on engines, API, security and reporting.

  3. 03

    You want content drafted and pushed, not only execution plans.

Start free trial

03 · Side by side

Fifteen questions, both answers.

The same questions on every compare page, so the table can't be tuned to flatter us. Each mark is a shape first and a colour second: a tick, a tilde for in part, a cross, a dash for not published.

The questionMentionovaas shipped 10 Oct 2026Bluefish AIfrom its own pagesChoose based on
Engines tracked
Yes: 6 on Scale and above: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Google, Reddit. 3 on Starter.
Yes: 5 named: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Alexa for Shopping, "other leading LLMs". Homepage: "10+ LLMs tracked daily including Alexa for Shopping, plus 15+ provider integrations". Monitoring suite: "ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and other leading LLMs". No enumerated list on site. PR Newswire Series B (third-party, fetched) names ChatGPT, Google AI, Claude, Perplexity, Amazon Rufus.
Which engines your buyers use; whether Starter's three are enough.
Scheduled runs
Yes: weekly, every two weeks or monthly; opportunities recomputed nightly.
Yes: "updated daily across 10+ models" (bluefishai.com/products/ai-monitoring-suite)
Daily snapshots, or scheduled runs with nightly opportunity scoring.
Metrics per run
Yes: mention rate, citation rate, share of voice, position-1 rate, sentiment, engine coverage, AI visibility score.
Yes: Impact Score, Influence Rank, Sentiment, Citation Analysis, Share of Voice by persona, Presence / brand representation, Campaign- and tactic-level KPI attribution, AI visibility lift.
Which numbers your reports have to show.
Drift alerts with diffs
Yes: eight typed drift events (a mention gained or lost, a position up or down, a changed description, a sentiment shift, a competitor entering or leaving) on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini, in the Monitor feed, with a daily opportunities digest by email.
Not published: Typed change events are not published as a feature; see the long-form sections below.
Being told what changed, not handed a new number.
Prompt volume data
No: Not sold as a dataset. Opportunities are scored on gap, reach, effort and heat.
No: Not published.
Whether you need demand estimates per prompt before you choose what to target.
Gaps turned into briefs
Yes: Opportunities recomputed nightly and scored 0–100 on gap, reach, effort and heat; each one carries a gap diagnosis, a specific action and a content brief.
Partly: Recommendations/tactics, not content generation: "Agentic Campaigns then builds the execution plan to reach it."; "page-specific tactics grounded in your data: a blueprint for what to do next." (https://bluefishai.com/products/ai-optimization-suite). No briefs, article generation, or CMS publishing claims on fetched pages.
The gap diagnosed and a brief written, or a list to act on yourself.
Drafts pushed to your CMS
Yes: brief → research → keywords → article in your brand voice → fact-check → editor → approval → schema; drafts land in WordPress, Webflow, Ghost, Sanity or any webhook, and nothing goes live without you.
No: not offered. Recommendations/tactics, not content generation: "Agentic Campaigns then builds the execution plan to reach it."; "page-specific tactics grounded in your data: a blueprint for what to do next." (https://bluefishai.com/products/ai-optimization-suite). No briefs, article generation, or CMS publishing claims on fetched pages.
Whether the tool should draft and deliver, or only recommend.
Reddit tracked and engaged
Yes: Tracked as an engine on Scale and above; finds the threads, drafts the reply in your voice; a person adds the disclosure and posts.
Not published: Not published.
Whether Reddit shapes answers in your category, and whether you want replies drafted.
Client workspaces and white-label
Yes: isolated client workspaces (3 on Launch, 10 on Growth, custom on Enterprise) and a portfolio view; report links with a view count and revoke; white-label logo, colour, tagline and footer.
Not published: not published. Reporting: not published.
How many clients you run and whether reports must carry your brand.
Integrations
Yes: 38 API connectors (Ahrefs, DataForSEO, Semrush, Moz, HubSpot, Contentful, Ghost and more) plus Search Console and GA4, and draft publishing to WordPress, Webflow, Ghost, Sanity or a webhook.
Yes: "15+ provider integrations", "native MCP integrations".
Which of your systems need to connect without engineering.
API and MCP
Yes: v1 API on Scale and above; an MCP server with 56 tools for any MCP client.
Partly: API: not published. MCP: included.
Whether your own agents or scripts need to read and write the data.
Crawler log analytics
No: Not offered. AI traffic is attributed on pages; crawler logs are not ingested.
No: Not offered.
Whether you need to see which bots fetched which pages, from your CDN logs.
Site audit
Yes: 42 checks: crawlability, on-page and duplicates, structured data, Core Web Vitals via PageSpeed Insights, mobile and security, internal links, hreflang, and four AEO checks (llms.txt, question H2s, entity and FAQ schema).
No: Not offered.
Whether technical and AEO checks belong in the same tool.
Try it on your own data first
Yes: 14-day free trial, no card: 5 prompts, 1 workspace, all six engines.
Not published: Trial: not published. Free plan: not published.
Whether you can see your own numbers before paying.
Entry price
Yes: $99/mo billed annually ($125 monthly) — Starter: 3 engines, 25 prompts, 100 agentic tasks.
Not published: not published: not published. not published.
What the first invoice buys.

Checked 10 Oct 2026 · Bluefish AI column from its pricing page, docs and changelog · Mentionova column from the product as shipped the same day · Spot an error? team@mentionova.com

04 · Pricing

What the first invoice buys.

Both ladders as published on 10 Oct 2026, then the same three buyers priced on each side. Bluefish AI's numbers come from bluefishai.com; a figure marked third-party wasn't on its site.

Mentionova

/pricing
Starter

$99/mo annual · $125 monthly

3 engines, 25 prompts, 100 agentic tasks

Scale

$320/mo annual · $400 monthly

6 engines incl. Reddit, 100 prompts, 500 tasks

Enterprise

$799/mo annual · $999 monthly

250 prompts, 2,500 tasks

Agencies

Launch $200 · Growth $799

3 or 10 client workspaces; Enterprise custom

Trial

14 days, no card

5 prompts, 1 workspace, all six engines

Bluefish AI

Pricing page
not published

not published

not published

Enterprise

custom; the only route is a demo request

Trial

not published

Billing: not published. Model: not published.

Three buyers, two bills.

The same brief priced on each side with the published plan that fits it. Where a plan doesn't fit the brief, the nearest one and the gap are named.

  1. Buyer 01

    One brand, 25 prompts, three engines

    Mentionova
    Starter, $99/mo billed annually ($125 monthly)
    Bluefish AI
    Not published
  2. Buyer 02

    One brand, 100 prompts, every engine

    Mentionova
    Scale, $320/mo billed annually ($400 monthly): 100 prompts on all six engines
    Bluefish AI
    Not published
  3. Buyer 03

    An agency with ten client workspaces

    Mentionova
    Growth, $799/mo billed annually ($999 monthly): 10 workspaces, 200 prompts, six engines
    Bluefish AI
    Not published; Bluefish says 85% of its customers add services to their contract

Watch for, on Mentionova

  • Starter tracks three engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google) and 25 prompts; the other three need Scale
  • The API is on Scale and above; the MCP server and connectors are on every plan
  • Runs are weekly, fortnightly or monthly; opportunities are rescored nightly, not the prompts

Watch for, on Bluefish AI

  • No public pricing: /pricing returns 404; only /contact/sales Source
  • No enumerated engine list on site; "10+ LLMs" and "15+ provider integrations" are unnamed Source
  • No free trial, self-serve signup, or API docs on fetched pages Source
  • No security/compliance statements on fetched pages; /security 404 Source

05 · Criterion by criterion

Seven things that actually differ.

Mentionova's column describes the product as shipped. The Bluefish AI column is built from its own pages. The edge line is our call, and it doesn't always go our way.

  1. 01

    Engines and cadence

    Choose based on: Which engines your buyers actually ask, and whether daily snapshots or scheduled runs with nightly scoring suit how you work.

    Mentionova

    Six engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Google and Reddit. Starter covers ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google; Scale and Enterprise cover all six. Each workspace runs weekly, every two weeks or monthly, and opportunities are recomputed from the latest run every night. Google runs record the organic top ten; AI Overviews are pulled on demand through Nova rather than tracked on a schedule.

    Bluefish AI

    Bluefish AI names 5 engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Alexa for Shopping, "other leading LLMs". Homepage: "10+ LLMs tracked daily including Alexa for Shopping, plus 15+ provider integrations". Monitoring suite: "ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and other leading LLMs". No enumerated list on site. PR Newswire Series B (third-party, fetched) names ChatGPT, Google AI, Claude, Perplexity, Amazon Rufus. Run cadence: "updated daily across 10+ models" (bluefishai.com/products/ai-monitoring-suite).

    EdgeBluefish says ten-plus LLMs tracked daily but names only ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Alexa; Mentionova names its six. Unknowable until a demo.

  2. 02

    What gets measured

    Choose based on: Which numbers your reports have to show, and whether you want to be told what changed rather than handed a new number.

    Mentionova

    Every run stores mention rate, citation rate, share of voice, position-1 rate, sentiment, engine coverage and an AI visibility score. Between runs the Monitor feed logs eight kinds of drift on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini: a mention gained or lost, a position up or down, a changed description, a sentiment shift, a competitor entering or leaving. A daily email digests the opportunities.

    Bluefish AI

    Bluefish AI reports Impact Score, Influence Rank, Sentiment, Citation Analysis, Share of Voice by persona, Presence / brand representation, Campaign- and tactic-level KPI attribution, AI visibility lift. Prompt volume or demand data: not published. Typed change alerts: not published as a feature.

    EdgeBluefish's Impact Score, Influence Rank and tactic attribution against Mentionova's seven metrics and typed drift. Different models; Bluefish's attribution is the distinctive piece.

  3. 03

    From gap to draft

    Choose based on: Whether the tool should diagnose the gap, write the brief and leave a draft in your CMS, or hand you a list to act on.

    Mentionova

    Opportunities are scored 0–100 on gap, reach, effort and heat, each with a diagnosis, a specific action and a content brief. The content workflow runs brief, research, keywords, article in your brand voice, fact-check, editor, approval and schema, then pushes a draft to WordPress, Webflow, Ghost, Sanity or any webhook. Nothing goes live without you.

    Bluefish AI

    Recommendations/tactics, not content generation: "Agentic Campaigns then builds the execution plan to reach it."; "page-specific tactics grounded in your data: a blueprint for what to do next." (https://bluefishai.com/products/ai-optimization-suite). No briefs, article generation, or CMS publishing claims on fetched pages. Automation: "Agents handle the analysis and tactic creation; teams coordinate and ship."; "A gap surfaces. An Agent picks it up. Your team acts." (optimization suite). Homepage: "Static prompts, model-drift controls, MCP, and Agents — built for AI as a channel"..

    EdgeBluefish agents build execution plans and tactics for your team to ship. Mentionova drafts the content and pushes it to your CMS. Mentionova.

  4. 04

    Reddit

    Choose based on: Whether Reddit threads shape the answers in your category, and whether you want replies drafted or only citations counted.

    Mentionova

    Reddit is a tracked engine on Scale and above: the threads where your category is discussed, the citations that reach AI answers, and reply drafts in your voice. A person adds the disclosure and posts; the agent never posts for you.

    Bluefish AI

    Bluefish AI doesn't publish Reddit tracking on any page we fetched.

    EdgeNot published by Bluefish. Mentionova.

  5. 05

    Agencies and reporting

    Choose based on: How many clients you run, and whether the report has to carry your brand without a BI tool in between.

    Mentionova

    Isolated client workspaces (3 on Launch, 10 on Growth, custom on Enterprise) with a portfolio view across them. Reports share by link with a view count and a revoke switch; white-label covers logo, colour, tagline and footer. Agency plans start at $200 a month.

    Bluefish AI

    not published. Reporting: not published.

    EdgeBluefish publishes no agency or white-label features. Mentionova.

  6. 06

    Integrations, API and MCP

    Choose based on: Which of your systems need to connect without engineering, and whether your own agents will read and write the data.

    Mentionova

    38 API connectors, among them Ahrefs, DataForSEO, Semrush, Moz, HubSpot, Contentful and Ghost, plus Search Console and GA4. The v1 API is on Scale and above. The MCP server exposes 56 tools to any MCP client, so your own agents can create prompts, read runs and pull reports.

    Bluefish AI

    Bluefish AI lists 2 integrations: "15+ provider integrations", "native MCP integrations". API: not published. MCP: included.

    EdgeBluefish cites fifteen-plus provider integrations and native MCP without naming them, and has no API docs. Mentionova lists its 38 connectors, API and 56 MCP tools. Mentionova on transparency.

  7. 07

    Site audit and technical

    Choose based on: Whether technical and AEO checks belong in the same tool as the briefs, and whether you need crawler logs rather than page checks.

    Mentionova

    A 42-check audit: crawlability, on-page and duplicates, structured data, Core Web Vitals via PageSpeed Insights, mobile and security, internal links, hreflang, and four AEO checks for llms.txt, question H2s, entity schema and FAQ schema. AI traffic shows up as page attribution; Mentionova doesn't ingest crawler logs.

    Bluefish AI

    Site audit: not offered. Crawler log analytics: not offered. Security: not published.

    EdgeBluefish publishes no site audit or crawler analytics. Mentionova.

06 · Credit where due

Where Bluefish AI is the better choice.

5 things it does that Mentionova doesn't, or does less of, each linked to the page that says so. Read these before the sales deck.

  1. 01

    The best-funded company on this page: $68M raised and 120-plus employees

    Source
  2. 02

    Daily tracking across ten-plus models, including Alexa for Shopping

    Source
  3. 03

    Tactic-level attribution: a specific tactic on a specific date and the metric it moved

    Source
  4. 04

    Native MCP and agents as the core architecture, not an add-on

    Source
  5. 05

    Over 10% of the Fortune 500 as customers, with Adidas, American Express and LVMH named in funding releases

    Source

07 · Switching

From Bluefish AI to a baseline, in an afternoon.

About twenty minutes of your time, then thirty days of both tools running side by side. Nothing here touches your site.

  1. Step 12 min

    Start the trial

    No pixel, tag or code. Sign up, name the workspace, pick the engines. The first growth signal lands in about two minutes.

  2. Step 210 min

    Bring your prompts

    Export the prompt list from Bluefish AI and add it to the workspace; the API and the MCP server create prompts in bulk from a list. The first run sets your baseline on every engine the plan covers.

  3. Step 310 min

    Connect the systems

    Search Console, GA4 and your CMS, whether WordPress, Webflow, Ghost, Sanity or a webhook, so briefs turn into drafts where your team already works.

  4. Step 40 min

    Run both for thirty days

    Keep Bluefish AI running. Compare the two on the questions above with your own data, then decide. Cancel either in a click.

What won't transfer

Bluefish AI's run history and dashboards stay in Bluefish AI; export them before you cancel anything. Prompts, competitor lists and brand-voice notes move in minutes. Mentionova starts its own history from the first run, so the sooner the trial starts, the longer the overlap you get to judge on.

Start the overlap

08 · FAQ

Mentionova vs Bluefish AI, asked.

Bluefish AI doesn't publish a price for its entry plan (not published). Mentionova's Starter is $99 a month billed annually ($125 monthly) for 25 prompts on three engines with 100 agentic tasks, and Scale is $320 for 100 prompts on all six.

It isn't published. The pricing page returned a 404 on 10 October 2026 and the only route is a demo request. Mentionova's plans start at $99 a month billed annually with a 14-day free trial.

Its site says ten-plus LLMs updated daily, naming ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Alexa for Shopping; a funding release adds Claude and Amazon Rufus. Mentionova names all six of its engines on its pricing page.

Yes. Export your prompt list, add the prompts to a Mentionova workspace (the API and the MCP server can create them in bulk from a list), and the first run gives you a baseline on every engine your plan covers. Your Bluefish AI history stays in your Bluefish AI exports.

Yes. Mentionova needs no pixel, tag or code, so the 14-day trial runs next to Bluefish AI without touching your site. Most teams compare a month of both before deciding.

Bluefish AI: "updated daily across 10+ models" (bluefishai.com/products/ai-monitoring-suite). Mentionova runs each workspace weekly, every two weeks or monthly, recomputes opportunities nightly and logs drift events between runs.

Every Bluefish AI fact comes from Bluefish AI's own pricing page, docs or changelog, fetched on 10 Oct 2026, and the claims that matter most link to the page they came from. Mentionova facts describe the product as shipped on the same date. If something has changed, email team@mentionova.com and we'll correct it.

Try it on your own data

Run both forthirty days.

Start the 14-day trial next to Bluefish AI: five prompts, one workspace, all six engines, no card. Then judge on your own numbers.

Bluefish AI is a trademark of its owner; Mentionova is not affiliated with or endorsed by it. Data checked 10 Oct 2026.