Compared on fifteen questions · checked 10 Oct 2026
Mentionova vs Bluefish AI
An enterprise engine sold by demo, or a platform you can price, trial and run yourself?
Choose Bluefish AI if you're a Fortune 500 brand that wants services bundled with software.
Choose Mentionova if you want to see prices and run a trial before talking to anyone.
14 days · no card · first growth signal in ~2 minutes
Engines
6
3 on Starter
5
named on its site
Runs
Weekly to monthly
opportunities nightly
Daily
From
$99/mo
billed annually
Not published
Trial
14 days
no card
Not published
Bluefish AI's numbers come from its own pricing page, docs and changelog
02 · The short answer
Who each one is for.
Bluefish AI positions itself as the agentic marketing engine for the Fortune 500, with $68 million raised, daily tracking across ten-plus models including Alexa for Shopping, tactic-level attribution and native MCP. There is no published pricing, engine list, trial, API documentation or security page; the way in is a sales conversation.
Bluefish AI describes itself as “Agentic Marketing Platform” and leads with “The Agentic Marketing Engine for the Fortune 500.”.
- Founded
- Launched 2024
- Based in
- New York
- Funding
- $68M (NEA, Threshold Ventures)
- Sells to
- Fortune 500 marketing teams
Choose Bluefish AI if
- 01
You're a Fortune 500 brand that wants services bundled with software.
- 02
Tactic-level attribution to a date and a metric is your main ask.
- 03
Alexa for Shopping is a surface you sell on.
Choose Mentionova if
- 01
You want to see prices and run a trial before talking to anyone.
- 02
You need published facts on engines, API, security and reporting.
- 03
You want content drafted and pushed, not only execution plans.
03 · Side by side
Fifteen questions, both answers.
The same questions on every compare page, so the table can't be tuned to flatter us. Each mark is a shape first and a colour second: a tick, a tilde for in part, a cross, a dash for not published.
| The question | Mentionovaas shipped 10 Oct 2026 | Bluefish AIfrom its own pages | Choose based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines tracked | Yes: 6 on Scale and above: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Google, Reddit. 3 on Starter. | Yes: 5 named: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Alexa for Shopping, "other leading LLMs". Homepage: "10+ LLMs tracked daily including Alexa for Shopping, plus 15+ provider integrations". Monitoring suite: "ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and other leading LLMs". No enumerated list on site. PR Newswire Series B (third-party, fetched) names ChatGPT, Google AI, Claude, Perplexity, Amazon Rufus. | Which engines your buyers use; whether Starter's three are enough. |
| Scheduled runs | Yes: weekly, every two weeks or monthly; opportunities recomputed nightly. | Yes: "updated daily across 10+ models" (bluefishai.com/products/ai-monitoring-suite) | Daily snapshots, or scheduled runs with nightly opportunity scoring. |
| Metrics per run | Yes: mention rate, citation rate, share of voice, position-1 rate, sentiment, engine coverage, AI visibility score. | Yes: Impact Score, Influence Rank, Sentiment, Citation Analysis, Share of Voice by persona, Presence / brand representation, Campaign- and tactic-level KPI attribution, AI visibility lift. | Which numbers your reports have to show. |
| Drift alerts with diffs | Yes: eight typed drift events (a mention gained or lost, a position up or down, a changed description, a sentiment shift, a competitor entering or leaving) on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini, in the Monitor feed, with a daily opportunities digest by email. | Not published: Typed change events are not published as a feature; see the long-form sections below. | Being told what changed, not handed a new number. |
| Prompt volume data | No: Not sold as a dataset. Opportunities are scored on gap, reach, effort and heat. | No: Not published. | Whether you need demand estimates per prompt before you choose what to target. |
| Gaps turned into briefs | Yes: Opportunities recomputed nightly and scored 0–100 on gap, reach, effort and heat; each one carries a gap diagnosis, a specific action and a content brief. | Partly: Recommendations/tactics, not content generation: "Agentic Campaigns then builds the execution plan to reach it."; "page-specific tactics grounded in your data: a blueprint for what to do next." (https://bluefishai.com/products/ai-optimization-suite). No briefs, article generation, or CMS publishing claims on fetched pages. | The gap diagnosed and a brief written, or a list to act on yourself. |
| Drafts pushed to your CMS | Yes: brief → research → keywords → article in your brand voice → fact-check → editor → approval → schema; drafts land in WordPress, Webflow, Ghost, Sanity or any webhook, and nothing goes live without you. | No: not offered. Recommendations/tactics, not content generation: "Agentic Campaigns then builds the execution plan to reach it."; "page-specific tactics grounded in your data: a blueprint for what to do next." (https://bluefishai.com/products/ai-optimization-suite). No briefs, article generation, or CMS publishing claims on fetched pages. | Whether the tool should draft and deliver, or only recommend. |
| Reddit tracked and engaged | Yes: Tracked as an engine on Scale and above; finds the threads, drafts the reply in your voice; a person adds the disclosure and posts. | Not published: Not published. | Whether Reddit shapes answers in your category, and whether you want replies drafted. |
| Client workspaces and white-label | Yes: isolated client workspaces (3 on Launch, 10 on Growth, custom on Enterprise) and a portfolio view; report links with a view count and revoke; white-label logo, colour, tagline and footer. | Not published: not published. Reporting: not published. | How many clients you run and whether reports must carry your brand. |
| Integrations | Yes: 38 API connectors (Ahrefs, DataForSEO, Semrush, Moz, HubSpot, Contentful, Ghost and more) plus Search Console and GA4, and draft publishing to WordPress, Webflow, Ghost, Sanity or a webhook. | Yes: "15+ provider integrations", "native MCP integrations". | Which of your systems need to connect without engineering. |
| API and MCP | Yes: v1 API on Scale and above; an MCP server with 56 tools for any MCP client. | Partly: API: not published. MCP: included. | Whether your own agents or scripts need to read and write the data. |
| Crawler log analytics | No: Not offered. AI traffic is attributed on pages; crawler logs are not ingested. | No: Not offered. | Whether you need to see which bots fetched which pages, from your CDN logs. |
| Site audit | Yes: 42 checks: crawlability, on-page and duplicates, structured data, Core Web Vitals via PageSpeed Insights, mobile and security, internal links, hreflang, and four AEO checks (llms.txt, question H2s, entity and FAQ schema). | No: Not offered. | Whether technical and AEO checks belong in the same tool. |
| Try it on your own data first | Yes: 14-day free trial, no card: 5 prompts, 1 workspace, all six engines. | Not published: Trial: not published. Free plan: not published. | Whether you can see your own numbers before paying. |
| Entry price | Yes: $99/mo billed annually ($125 monthly) — Starter: 3 engines, 25 prompts, 100 agentic tasks. | Not published: not published: not published. not published. | What the first invoice buys. |
Checked 10 Oct 2026 · Bluefish AI column from its pricing page, docs and changelog · Mentionova column from the product as shipped the same day · Spot an error? team@mentionova.com
04 · Pricing
What the first invoice buys.
Both ladders as published on 10 Oct 2026, then the same three buyers priced on each side. Bluefish AI's numbers come from bluefishai.com; a figure marked third-party wasn't on its site.
Mentionova
/pricing- Starter
$99/mo annual · $125 monthly
3 engines, 25 prompts, 100 agentic tasks
- Scale
$320/mo annual · $400 monthly
6 engines incl. Reddit, 100 prompts, 500 tasks
- Enterprise
$799/mo annual · $999 monthly
250 prompts, 2,500 tasks
- Agencies
Launch $200 · Growth $799
3 or 10 client workspaces; Enterprise custom
- Trial
14 days, no card
5 prompts, 1 workspace, all six engines
Bluefish AI
Pricing page- not published
not published
not published
- Enterprise
custom; the only route is a demo request
- Trial
not published
Billing: not published. Model: not published.
Three buyers, two bills.
The same brief priced on each side with the published plan that fits it. Where a plan doesn't fit the brief, the nearest one and the gap are named.
Buyer 01
One brand, 25 prompts, three engines
- Mentionova
- Starter, $99/mo billed annually ($125 monthly)
- Bluefish AI
- Not published
Buyer 02
One brand, 100 prompts, every engine
- Mentionova
- Scale, $320/mo billed annually ($400 monthly): 100 prompts on all six engines
- Bluefish AI
- Not published
Buyer 03
An agency with ten client workspaces
- Mentionova
- Growth, $799/mo billed annually ($999 monthly): 10 workspaces, 200 prompts, six engines
- Bluefish AI
- Not published; Bluefish says 85% of its customers add services to their contract
Watch for, on Mentionova
- Starter tracks three engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google) and 25 prompts; the other three need Scale
- The API is on Scale and above; the MCP server and connectors are on every plan
- Runs are weekly, fortnightly or monthly; opportunities are rescored nightly, not the prompts
Watch for, on Bluefish AI
- No public pricing: /pricing returns 404; only /contact/sales Source
- No enumerated engine list on site; "10+ LLMs" and "15+ provider integrations" are unnamed Source
- No free trial, self-serve signup, or API docs on fetched pages Source
- No security/compliance statements on fetched pages; /security 404 Source
05 · Criterion by criterion
Seven things that actually differ.
Mentionova's column describes the product as shipped. The Bluefish AI column is built from its own pages. The edge line is our call, and it doesn't always go our way.
01
Engines and cadence
Choose based on: Which engines your buyers actually ask, and whether daily snapshots or scheduled runs with nightly scoring suit how you work.
Mentionova
Six engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Google and Reddit. Starter covers ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google; Scale and Enterprise cover all six. Each workspace runs weekly, every two weeks or monthly, and opportunities are recomputed from the latest run every night. Google runs record the organic top ten; AI Overviews are pulled on demand through Nova rather than tracked on a schedule.
Bluefish AI
Bluefish AI names 5 engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Alexa for Shopping, "other leading LLMs". Homepage: "10+ LLMs tracked daily including Alexa for Shopping, plus 15+ provider integrations". Monitoring suite: "ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and other leading LLMs". No enumerated list on site. PR Newswire Series B (third-party, fetched) names ChatGPT, Google AI, Claude, Perplexity, Amazon Rufus. Run cadence: "updated daily across 10+ models" (bluefishai.com/products/ai-monitoring-suite).
EdgeBluefish says ten-plus LLMs tracked daily but names only ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Alexa; Mentionova names its six. Unknowable until a demo.
02
What gets measured
Choose based on: Which numbers your reports have to show, and whether you want to be told what changed rather than handed a new number.
Mentionova
Every run stores mention rate, citation rate, share of voice, position-1 rate, sentiment, engine coverage and an AI visibility score. Between runs the Monitor feed logs eight kinds of drift on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini: a mention gained or lost, a position up or down, a changed description, a sentiment shift, a competitor entering or leaving. A daily email digests the opportunities.
Bluefish AI
Bluefish AI reports Impact Score, Influence Rank, Sentiment, Citation Analysis, Share of Voice by persona, Presence / brand representation, Campaign- and tactic-level KPI attribution, AI visibility lift. Prompt volume or demand data: not published. Typed change alerts: not published as a feature.
EdgeBluefish's Impact Score, Influence Rank and tactic attribution against Mentionova's seven metrics and typed drift. Different models; Bluefish's attribution is the distinctive piece.
03
From gap to draft
Choose based on: Whether the tool should diagnose the gap, write the brief and leave a draft in your CMS, or hand you a list to act on.
Mentionova
Opportunities are scored 0–100 on gap, reach, effort and heat, each with a diagnosis, a specific action and a content brief. The content workflow runs brief, research, keywords, article in your brand voice, fact-check, editor, approval and schema, then pushes a draft to WordPress, Webflow, Ghost, Sanity or any webhook. Nothing goes live without you.
Bluefish AI
Recommendations/tactics, not content generation: "Agentic Campaigns then builds the execution plan to reach it."; "page-specific tactics grounded in your data: a blueprint for what to do next." (https://bluefishai.com/products/ai-optimization-suite). No briefs, article generation, or CMS publishing claims on fetched pages. Automation: "Agents handle the analysis and tactic creation; teams coordinate and ship."; "A gap surfaces. An Agent picks it up. Your team acts." (optimization suite). Homepage: "Static prompts, model-drift controls, MCP, and Agents — built for AI as a channel"..
EdgeBluefish agents build execution plans and tactics for your team to ship. Mentionova drafts the content and pushes it to your CMS. Mentionova.
04
Reddit
Choose based on: Whether Reddit threads shape the answers in your category, and whether you want replies drafted or only citations counted.
Mentionova
Reddit is a tracked engine on Scale and above: the threads where your category is discussed, the citations that reach AI answers, and reply drafts in your voice. A person adds the disclosure and posts; the agent never posts for you.
Bluefish AI
Bluefish AI doesn't publish Reddit tracking on any page we fetched.
EdgeNot published by Bluefish. Mentionova.
05
Agencies and reporting
Choose based on: How many clients you run, and whether the report has to carry your brand without a BI tool in between.
Mentionova
Isolated client workspaces (3 on Launch, 10 on Growth, custom on Enterprise) with a portfolio view across them. Reports share by link with a view count and a revoke switch; white-label covers logo, colour, tagline and footer. Agency plans start at $200 a month.
Bluefish AI
not published. Reporting: not published.
EdgeBluefish publishes no agency or white-label features. Mentionova.
06
Integrations, API and MCP
Choose based on: Which of your systems need to connect without engineering, and whether your own agents will read and write the data.
Mentionova
38 API connectors, among them Ahrefs, DataForSEO, Semrush, Moz, HubSpot, Contentful and Ghost, plus Search Console and GA4. The v1 API is on Scale and above. The MCP server exposes 56 tools to any MCP client, so your own agents can create prompts, read runs and pull reports.
Bluefish AI
Bluefish AI lists 2 integrations: "15+ provider integrations", "native MCP integrations". API: not published. MCP: included.
EdgeBluefish cites fifteen-plus provider integrations and native MCP without naming them, and has no API docs. Mentionova lists its 38 connectors, API and 56 MCP tools. Mentionova on transparency.
07
Site audit and technical
Choose based on: Whether technical and AEO checks belong in the same tool as the briefs, and whether you need crawler logs rather than page checks.
Mentionova
A 42-check audit: crawlability, on-page and duplicates, structured data, Core Web Vitals via PageSpeed Insights, mobile and security, internal links, hreflang, and four AEO checks for llms.txt, question H2s, entity schema and FAQ schema. AI traffic shows up as page attribution; Mentionova doesn't ingest crawler logs.
Bluefish AI
Site audit: not offered. Crawler log analytics: not offered. Security: not published.
EdgeBluefish publishes no site audit or crawler analytics. Mentionova.
06 · Credit where due
Where Bluefish AI is the better choice.
5 things it does that Mentionova doesn't, or does less of, each linked to the page that says so. Read these before the sales deck.
- 01
The best-funded company on this page: $68M raised and 120-plus employees
Source - 02
Daily tracking across ten-plus models, including Alexa for Shopping
Source - 03
Tactic-level attribution: a specific tactic on a specific date and the metric it moved
Source - 04
Native MCP and agents as the core architecture, not an add-on
Source - 05
Over 10% of the Fortune 500 as customers, with Adidas, American Express and LVMH named in funding releases
Source
07 · Switching
From Bluefish AI to a baseline, in an afternoon.
About twenty minutes of your time, then thirty days of both tools running side by side. Nothing here touches your site.
- Step 12 min
Start the trial
No pixel, tag or code. Sign up, name the workspace, pick the engines. The first growth signal lands in about two minutes.
- Step 210 min
Bring your prompts
Export the prompt list from Bluefish AI and add it to the workspace; the API and the MCP server create prompts in bulk from a list. The first run sets your baseline on every engine the plan covers.
- Step 310 min
Connect the systems
Search Console, GA4 and your CMS, whether WordPress, Webflow, Ghost, Sanity or a webhook, so briefs turn into drafts where your team already works.
- Step 40 min
Run both for thirty days
Keep Bluefish AI running. Compare the two on the questions above with your own data, then decide. Cancel either in a click.
What won't transfer
Bluefish AI's run history and dashboards stay in Bluefish AI; export them before you cancel anything. Prompts, competitor lists and brand-voice notes move in minutes. Mentionova starts its own history from the first run, so the sooner the trial starts, the longer the overlap you get to judge on.
Start the overlap08 · FAQ
Mentionova vs Bluefish AI, asked.
Bluefish AI doesn't publish a price for its entry plan (not published). Mentionova's Starter is $99 a month billed annually ($125 monthly) for 25 prompts on three engines with 100 agentic tasks, and Scale is $320 for 100 prompts on all six.
It isn't published. The pricing page returned a 404 on 10 October 2026 and the only route is a demo request. Mentionova's plans start at $99 a month billed annually with a 14-day free trial.
Its site says ten-plus LLMs updated daily, naming ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Alexa for Shopping; a funding release adds Claude and Amazon Rufus. Mentionova names all six of its engines on its pricing page.
Yes. Export your prompt list, add the prompts to a Mentionova workspace (the API and the MCP server can create them in bulk from a list), and the first run gives you a baseline on every engine your plan covers. Your Bluefish AI history stays in your Bluefish AI exports.
Yes. Mentionova needs no pixel, tag or code, so the 14-day trial runs next to Bluefish AI without touching your site. Most teams compare a month of both before deciding.
Bluefish AI: "updated daily across 10+ models" (bluefishai.com/products/ai-monitoring-suite). Mentionova runs each workspace weekly, every two weeks or monthly, recomputes opportunities nightly and logs drift events between runs.
Every Bluefish AI fact comes from Bluefish AI's own pricing page, docs or changelog, fetched on 10 Oct 2026, and the claims that matter most link to the page they came from. Mentionova facts describe the product as shipped on the same date. If something has changed, email team@mentionova.com and we'll correct it.
Other comparisons
All comparisonsMentionova vs
AirOps
Enterprise content operations teams
13 CMS targets, no published pricefrom $200/mo
Mentionova vs
AthenaHQ
Teams that want a free tier and many engines
11 engines, 1 credit per AI responsefrom $0/mo
Mentionova vs
Evertune
Large brands buying AI ads with their measurement
11 models, $800/mo, no trialfrom $800/mo
Mentionova vs
Goodie
Commerce brands on agentic shopping surfaces
12 models; 120 prompts at $399from $399/mo
Try it on your own data
Run both forthirty days.
Start the 14-day trial next to Bluefish AI: five prompts, one workspace, all six engines, no card. Then judge on your own numbers.
Bluefish AI is a trademark of its owner; Mentionova is not affiliated with or endorsed by it. Data checked 10 Oct 2026.