The exact edits that win the answer back.
It joins what the engines cite to Search Console, then returns ranked edits tied to the answer each one wins back.
5 steps · runs on a schedule · added to your workspace as a draft
What it does
Pre-built, then yours to customize.
Add it to your workspace in one click. Sensible defaults and example inputs are already filled in.
Reads from · writes to
- Google Search Console
- Your Mentionova workspace
The template, step for step
- Trigger
- Citation intel
- GSC metrics
- LLM call
- Notify
Ships with the schedule 0 8 * * 1 — Mondays, 08:00 UTC. It is added as a Draft; the schedule starts once you set it Active.
- 01
Joins AI citations to real Search Console data
- 02
Finds pages that rank but never get cited
- 03
Edits ranked by the visibility each recovers
- 04
Runs on a schedule, so the list stays current
In, and out
You give it your workspace and Search Console. This is what comes back.
- Shape
- 5 steps
- Scheduled
- run mode
- 1
- click to add
/pricing#1
Add a comparison table the engines can lift
/blog/aeo-guide#2
Answer the question in the first 40 words
/product/tracker#3
Cite a first-party number, with a date
/docs/setup#4
Add FAQPage schema to the six questions
Illustrative output.
Two tables, one join
It ranks. It just isn't cited.
The pages worth editing are the ones Google already trusts and the engines still skip.
01 · Search Console knows where every page ranks.
02 · Citation data knows which pages the engines actually quote.
03 · Joined on URL, they finally line up row by row.
04 · Three pages rank in the top six and have never been cited.
05 · Those are the edits — ordered by what each would win back.
Search Console · position
- /pricing#3
- /blog/aeo-guide#4
- /product/tracker#6
- /docs/setup#2
- /blog/geo-tools#5
Citation intel · times cited, 30 days
- never citedranks · not cited
- 7 citationsfine
- never citedranks · not cited
- 5 citationsfine
- never citedranks · not cited
Edits, ranked by the visibility each recoversMondays, 08:00 UTC
- 1/pricingAdd a comparison table the engines can lift
- 2/product/trackerCite a first-party number, with a date
- 3/blog/geo-toolsAnswer the question in the first 40 words
The steps
What happens on every run.
- 01
Read the citation intel
Which prompts you are cited for, and which you are not.
- 02
Pull Search Console
Real impressions, clicks and position for the same page.
- 03
Find the visibility gaps
Where you rank but are not cited — the pages leaking answers.
- 04
Write the ranked edits
Specific changes, ordered by the visibility each would recover.
- 05
Save the plan
Filed against the page so you can work down the list.
Before & after
The time this gives back.
The templates that publish put a Human review step before the CMS step, and nothing ever posts to Reddit for you. Review is a step, not a lock: a workflow you build or edit can publish or message a channel without one, so add it wherever you want the sign-off.
Doing it by hand~3.5 hrs
AEO visibility refresh suggestions~45 min
Bars to scale: the time a person spends, each way.
Doing it by handyour team
- Exporting and joining the data~1.5h
- Working out where the gap is~1h
- Deciding what to change~1h
Per page, by hand~3.5 hrs
AEO visibility refresh suggestionsLive
- Agent joins both sourcesauto
- Agent ranks the editsauto
- You ship the top edits~45m
Scheduled agent~45 min
FAQ
Questions, answered.
On their own each misleads. Search Console shows classic search only; citation data shows answers only. A page ranking third but cited by nothing is the specific problem worth fixing, and you only see it when both sit side by side.
Yes, the HTTP request step pulls from it. Connect it under Settings, then the agent can run.
By the visibility each would recover — a page with real impressions that no engine cites ranks above one nobody finds either way.
Free to start
Add this agentto your workspace.
Start free. Customize the steps, run it on demand or on a schedule, and approve anything that ships.